Comments on: Stubs in Moq

By: Tim Long

Tim Long — Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:11:27 +0000

There’s no need to use teh Stub namespace. The same result is achieved with:

// start “tracking” sets/gets to this property
mock.SetupProperty(f => f.Name);

// alternatively, provide a default value for the stubbed property mock.SetupProperty(f => f.Name, “foo”);

By: John

John — Mon, 28 Mar 2011 07:26:26 +0000

I think the assertion against the mock object was merely for the purposes of demonstration of the functionality written about in the article

By: Stonie

Stonie — Fri, 26 Nov 2010 06:00:00 +0000

Why are you asserting against the mock? I can’t see where you are testing anything concrete? (the SUT) isn’t the point of the mock is that you use it to test against some real code?

Maybe that is your intent? But it might be clearer if you include the SUT in your example?

Regards,
Stonie.